![\"With](\"https:\/\/static.toiimg.com\/thumb\/msid-131931428,imgsize-2854263,width-400,height-225,resizemode-4\/ai-representational.jpg\" "\\"AI")
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\nBENGALURU: \u201cIndividuals shall have the right to complete and connected streets and the right to access any place in an urban area by walk or by cycle.\u201d Those words sound like they could have come straight from the Supreme Court\u2019s June 19 ruling declaring that safe walking is part of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 21 and 19(1)(d).They did not. They are from Section 30 of Karnataka\u2019s draft Active Mobility Bill, prepared in Dec 2021 by the Directorate of Urban Land Transport (DULT). The irony is hard to miss. While SC has now called for a dedicated law to protect pedestrians, Karnataka has spent years sitting on one.Spread across 17 chapters and 55 sections, the draft seeks to turn safe walking and cycling from civic aspirations into statutory obligations.<\/p>\n Putting people before vehicles<\/span>An analysis of the draft bill shows that six chapters do the heavy lifting. New streets must come with footpaths and cycle tracks built in from the start, not retrofitted if space allows, and existing roads must be redeveloped to incorporate walking and cycling infrastructure. Drivers get a statutory duty to yield at crossings, not just a courtesy expectation.Section 4 places a duty on urban local bodies to design, construct and maintain complete and connected streets with adequate footpaths and cycle tracks. Section 5 explicitly states that streets must prioritise the movement of people over vehicles.Annual audits & inspections<\/span>Unlike many policy documents, the draft prescribes timelines and accountability. Municipal corporations are required to prepare Comprehensive Mobility Plans within two years. Urban local bodies must conduct annual audits of infrastructure and carry out regular \u201cwalking inspections\u201d, with physical and digital records maintained.These are specifically required to identify issues faced by women, children, senior citizens and persons with disabilities.Safer streets, funding & accountability<\/span>The bill proposes footpaths to be continuous, unobstructed, well-lit and accessible. It mandates kerb ramps, pedestrian refuge islands, dedicated signal phases and traffic-calming measures.Residential areas, school zones and hospital zones with high pedestrian movement are to be designated \u201cslow streets\u201d, with speeds capped at 20 kmph.Section 22 bars any agency or individual from erecting temporary or permanent structures on footpaths and cycle tracks, treating them as infringements on pedestrian rights. Construction works are required to provide safe detours. Motorists are prohibited from parking on footpaths.Perhaps the strongest provision is Chapter 15. It gives pedestrian and cycling infrastructure \u201cfirst charge\u201d on municipal funds \u2014 the kind of protection that matters when budgets get squeezed. The Bill also creates grievance redressal systems and empowers authorities to levy fines up to Rs 1 lakh, rising to Rs 2 lakh for repeat violations. Even govt departments can be held liable.4Yrs on, The question is why<\/span>The SC has supplied the constitutional backing. Karnataka already has the legislative blueprint. The missing piece is political urgency. Because every year that the Bill remains in a limbo is another year in which pedestrians are forced off broken pavements, onto carriageways and into harm\u2019s way.DULT commissioner P Manivannan, who has now been given additional charge of the agency, told TOI that he would \u201clook into the bill\u201d in the coming week.<\/div>\n![\"Opinion\"](\"https:\/\/static.toiimg.com\/photo\/msid-131931283\/opinion.jpg\" "\\"\\"")
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n