![\"Jamaican](\"https:\/\/static.toiimg.com\/thumb\/msid-131831126,imgsize-43436,width-400,height-225,resizemode-4\/jamaican-man-convicted-in-underage-sex-case.jpg\" "\\"Jamaican")
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nA Jamaican national convicted in the United States for a sex offence involving an underage girl has won a significant legal battle in the United Kingdom after a senior court ordered a fresh hearing into his bid to enter the country.Oniel Spence, 43, had applied in 2023 to join his British wife and daughter in the UK. The Home Office rejected the application, arguing that his presence would not be conducive to the public good because of his criminal history.<\/p>\n Spence was convicted in the US in 2008 for a sexual offence involving an underage girl and was sentenced to three years in prison. He was deported to Jamaica after serving part of his sentence.British authorities later blocked his attempt to settle in the UK. However, an immigration tribunal initially ruled in his favour after hearing arguments that refusing entry would interfere with his right to family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).<\/p>\n The decision prompted a series of legal challenges by the UK government. After appeals by the Home Office and ministers, the case eventually reached the Court of Appeal.Senior judges have now overturned the earlier tribunal ruling and directed that the matter be reconsidered by a lower immigration tribunal.In its judgment, the court noted concerns about Spence’s explanations regarding his past conduct and questioned whether he had fully addressed issues arising from his offending history.<\/p>\n The judgment recorded that Spence had sought to characterise the offence as an isolated incident. However, judges said aspects of the evidence raised questions about the extent to which he had been candid about his past behaviour.The court also noted that his relationship with his wife began when she was a teenager and he was in his twenties.“Plainly, this appellant has been sexually attracted to children and has pursued relationships with children in the past,” Lord Justice Lewis said in the ruling.<\/p>\n The case has reignited debate in Britain over the role of human rights legislation in immigration decisions involving foreign nationals with criminal convictions.Shadow home secretary Chris Philp criticised the original tribunal decision, arguing that elected politicians rather than courts should have greater authority over immigration outcomes.The Home Office said it would continue to contest the case, maintaining that Spence’s admission to the UK would not be in the public interest.“We strongly believe this individual’s presence in the UK is not conducive to the public good,” a spokesperson said.The case will now return to the First-tier Tribunal for a fresh hearing<\/div>\nConviction and deportation<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
Government challenge reaches Court of Appeal<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
Court cites concerns over past behaviour<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
Political row over human rights laws<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n