{"id":12498,"date":"2026-05-04T07:32:06","date_gmt":"2026-05-04T02:02:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/banitoday.com\/congress-government-ignored-nicobar-concerns-india-news\/"},"modified":"2026-05-04T07:32:06","modified_gmt":"2026-05-04T02:02:06","slug":"congress-government-ignored-nicobar-concerns-india-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/banitoday.com\/hi\/congress-government-ignored-nicobar-concerns-india-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Congress: Government ignored Nicobar concerns | India News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div data-articlebody=\"1\"><video-embed value=\"false\"\/><\/p>\n<div class=\"ihgno clearfix  \">\n<div class=\"e9jwa\">\n<div class=\"vdo_embedd\">\n<div class=\"GfdvZ\">\n<section class=\"_bIDB  clearfix id-r-component leadmedia undefined undefined  E9tg9 \" style=\"top:0px\">\n<div class=\"_bIDB\" data-ua-type=\"1\" onclick=\"stpPgtnAndPrvntDefault(event)\">\n<div class=\"ypVvZ\">\n<div class=\"WGttI\"><img src=\"https:\/\/static.toiimg.com\/thumb\/msid-130742697,imgsize-1435533,width-400,height-225,resizemode-4\/untitled-design-43.jpg\" alt=\"Congress: Government ignored Nicobar concerns\" title=\"&lt;p&gt;File photo&lt;\/p&gt;\" decoding=\"async\" fetchpriority=\"high\"\/><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>NEW DELHI: Two days after government issued a detailed note on the ambitious Great Nicobar Project, clarifying certain questions raised by <a href=\"https:\/\/timesofindia.indiatimes.com\/topic\/rahul-gandhi\" styleobj=\"[object Object]\" class=\"\" commonstate=\"[object Object]\" frmappuse=\"1\">Rahul Gandhi<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/timesofindia.indiatimes.com\/topic\/congress\" styleobj=\"[object Object]\" class=\"\" commonstate=\"[object Object]\" frmappuse=\"1\">Congress<\/a> countered its stance on Sunday by saying Centre had failed to address serious concerns raised by affected local communities, environmentalists, anthropologists, academics and civil society voices regarding the project.<!-- --> The opposition party also demanded a parliamentary debate on the issue to address transparency and security concerns.<span class=\"id-r-component br\" data-pos=\"7\"\/>Congress neta Jairam Ramesh refuted government\u2019s claim that the project is a strategic initiative to strengthen India\u2019s presence in Andaman Sea by quoting former chief of naval staff Admiral Arun Prakash (retired) who had argued that \u201cthe security capabilities of ANC (Andaman &amp; Nicobar Command) need to be addressed separately and must have no linkage with the developments contemplated for GNI (Great Nicobar Island)\u201d.<span class=\"id-r-component br\" data-pos=\"11\"\/>In a four-page note, Ramesh said, \u201cThere is thus no need to link India\u2019s legitimate security imperatives with the so-called \u2018development project\u2019 \u2014 complete with a township, high-end tourist infrastructure and large transshipment terminal &#8212; that the Modi government is intent on bulldozing through&#8230;\u201d<span class=\"id-r-component br\" data-pos=\"13\"\/>The party alleged that government is in \u201cdamage control mode\u201d following a recent visit to the island by leader of opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi. Ramesh argued that the Great Nicobar ecosystem is unique and cannot be compared to other islands in the archipelago.<span class=\"id-r-component br\" data-pos=\"15\"\/>Flagging significant concerns regarding the Nicobarese and Shompen groups, he pointed out that Nicobarese community had withdrawn its No Objection Certificate (NoC) for forest diversion in Nov 2022.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/timesofindia.indiatimes.com\/india\/congress-government-ignored-nicobar-concerns\/articleshow\/130742653.cms\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NEW DELHI: Two days after government issued a detailed note on the ambitious Great Nicobar Project, clarifying certain questions raised by Rahul Gandhi, Congress countered its stance on Sunday by saying Centre had failed to address serious concerns raised by affected local communities, environmentalists, anthropologists, academics and civil society voices regarding the project. The opposition [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":12499,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[133],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-12498","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-country"},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/banitoday.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12498","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/banitoday.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/banitoday.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banitoday.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banitoday.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12498"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/banitoday.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12498\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banitoday.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12499"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/banitoday.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12498"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banitoday.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12498"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banitoday.com\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12498"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}