![\"CGBSE](\"https:\/\/static.toiimg.com\/thumb\/msid-130604575,imgsize-2192948,width-400,height-225,resizemode-4\/cgbse-chhattisgarh-board-class-10-toppers-2026.jpg\" "\\"CGBSE")
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nCGBSE Chhattisgarh Board Class 10 result 2026<\/span>: <\/span>The Chhattisgarh Board of Secondary Education (CGBSE) has released the Class 10 merit list along with the High School Certificate Examination 2026 results. The toppers list shows a tie at the top, with three students securing Rank 1 with identical scores.The merit list also sees multiple shared positions across ranks, especially at Rank 2 and Rank 5, indicating close competition among students this year.As per the official merit list , here are the toppers up to Rank 5:<\/p>\n As per the official merit list, here are the toppers up to Rank 5:<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The top rank is shared by three students, each scoring 594 out of 600, or 99 percent. Rank 2 has an even larger cluster, with five students scoring 593 marks. This pattern continues across the merit list, showing how narrowly separated the top scores are.Mahasamund district has a strong presence in the top ranks, with multiple students featuring in Rank 1 and Rank 2. Raipur and Mungeli also appear repeatedly in the top positions.<\/p>\n Alongside the toppers list, CGBSE reported an overall pass percentage of 77.15 percent. Girls recorded a higher pass percentage of 81.03 percent, while boys stood at 72.27 percent.Out of over 3.16 lakh students who appeared for the exam, more than 2.43 lakh candidates passed, with a significant number securing first division.<\/p>\n The clustering of ranks suggests that the difference between top-performing students is minimal. A difference of just one or two marks has pushed students across ranks, especially between Rank 1 and Rank 3.For students, this reflects a highly competitive evaluation cycle where small score variations determine final positions. For schools and districts, it highlights where academic performance is consistently strong.<\/div>\n
<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n\n
\n Rank
<\/strong><\/td>\nStudent Name
<\/strong><\/td>\nDistrict
<\/strong><\/td>\nMarks
<\/strong><\/td>\nPercentage<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 1<\/td>\n Sandhya Nayak<\/td>\n Mahasamund<\/td>\n 594\/600<\/td>\n 99.00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 1<\/td>\n Parirani Pradhan<\/td>\n Mahasamund<\/td>\n 594\/600<\/td>\n 99.00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 1<\/td>\n Anshul Sharma<\/td>\n Mungeli<\/td>\n 594\/600<\/td>\n 99.00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 2<\/td>\n Riya Kesharwani<\/td>\n Kabirdham<\/td>\n 593\/600<\/td>\n 98.83%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 2<\/td>\n Ranu Siddhimayi Sahu<\/td>\n Mahasamund<\/td>\n 593\/600<\/td>\n 98.83%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 2<\/td>\n Renuka Pradhan<\/td>\n Mahasamund<\/td>\n 593\/600<\/td>\n 98.83%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 2<\/td>\n Dipanshi Bouddh<\/td>\n Raipur<\/td>\n 593\/600<\/td>\n 98.83%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 2<\/td>\n Nandita Dewangan<\/td>\n Mungeli<\/td>\n 593\/600<\/td>\n 98.83%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 3<\/td>\n Kalpana Yadav<\/td>\n Raipur<\/td>\n 592\/600<\/td>\n 98.67%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 4<\/td>\n Sahil Bareth<\/td>\n Durg<\/td>\n 591\/600<\/td>\n 98.50%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 4<\/td>\n Aditya Basu<\/td>\n Raipur<\/td>\n 591\/600<\/td>\n 98.50%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 5<\/td>\n Vishal Yadav<\/td>\n Raipur<\/td>\n 590\/600<\/td>\n 98.33%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 5<\/td>\n Girija Pradhan<\/td>\n Raigarh<\/td>\n 590\/600<\/td>\n 98.33%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n What stands out this year
<\/h2>\n<\/p>\nOverall result context
<\/h2>\n<\/p>\nWhat the merit list indicates
<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n